{"id":366,"date":"2025-05-29T19:50:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-29T19:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotevale.com\/?p=366"},"modified":"2025-05-30T10:29:34","modified_gmt":"2025-05-30T10:29:34","slug":"is-a-movie-car-a-copyrighted-character-a-top-court-just-decided","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotevale.com\/index.php\/2025\/05\/29\/is-a-movie-car-a-copyrighted-character-a-top-court-just-decided\/","title":{"rendered":"Is A Movie Car A Copyrighted Character? A Top Court Just Decided"},"content":{"rendered":"
Since the early 2000s, those who wanted to build a Shelby Mustang<\/a> GT500 had to be careful about how it looked in the end. The widow of the man who directed the original Gone in 60 Seconds notoriously litigated those who built cars that looked like the Mustang in that film, named Eleanor. After losing a court battle in 2022<\/a>, she appealed and just lost again.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\tvar adpushup = window.adpushup = window.adpushup || {que:[]}; Denise Halicki, the widow, claimed that the car Eleanor was a character and was subject to copyright. For many years, she was successful in convincing courts of this and even had some big wins. In 2020, she went after YouTuber Chris Steinbacher for building an Eleanor tribute car. Not only did she get his project shut down, but he ended up losing the vehicle<\/a>.<\/p>\n Read: The \u201967 Ghost Is A Mustang Like No Other<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Now, those interested in building such a car can rest even easier after an appeals court shut down Halicki for a second time. The decision comes from a panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.<\/a> The panel was almost salty-sounding in their opinion. Specifically, they said that \u201cAppellants\u2019 argument stalls at the starting line: we hold that Eleanor is not a character, much less a copyrightable one.\u201d Why be so harsh in what seemed like a legitimate challenge in the past?<\/p>\n The \u201cEleanor\u201d Test: No Character, Just Car<\/strong><\/p>\n The lynchpin to this whole thing came down to the car itself. As one judge put it, \u201cEleanor was not entitled to character copyright protection because it (1) did not have conceptual qualities, (2) did not have consistent traits, and (3) was not especially distinctive.\u201d These facets of the argument are part of what the court calls the Towle test, named for a previous copyright lawsuit.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\tadpushup.que.push(function() {
\n\t\t\t\t\tif (adpushup.config.platform !== “DESKTOP”){
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tadpushup.triggerAd(“0f7e3106-c4d6-4db4-8135-c508879a76f8”);
\n\t\t\t\t\t} else {
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tadpushup.triggerAd(“82503191-e1d1-435a-874f-9c78a2a54a2f”);
\n\t\t\t\t\t}
\n\t\t\t\t});<\/p><\/div>\n